Home / posts / News / How Does the Commissioning Process Inhibit the Uptake of Complexity-Appropriate Evaluation?

How Does the Commissioning Process Inhibit the Uptake of Complexity-Appropriate Evaluation?

Sep 11, 2019 | News

11th September 2019

CECAN Fellow, Jayne Cox, has published a project report from her funded fellowship project entitled “How does the commissioning process inhibit the uptake of complexity-appropriate evaluation?”. The report is available to download here.

The study identified barriers to adopting complexity-appropriate methods that arise from the competitive tendering process used to commission policy evaluations. Interviewees thought the process deals especially poorly with two of the intrinsic features of complexity-appropriate approaches – the need for flexibility and iteration to respond to emergence, and the value of collaborative working and co-creation. The report offers a range of solutions, from small tweaks of existing tendering processes to a radical overhaul of evaluation commissioning.

Slides from an earlier workshop presentation can also be found here.

CECAN Webinar – The benefits and challenges of conducting research with impact ‘built in’: reflections and findings from an evaluation of Electronic Monitoring with the Ministry of Justice, with Ian Brunton-Smith. 23 Jun, 1 - 2pm BST. Includes live Q&A! Register free: www.cecan.ac.uk/events/cecan...

[image or embed]

— CECAN (@cecan.bsky.social) April 9, 2025 at 12:22 PM

*New Resource* - 'Guidance on using large language models to extract cause-and-effect pairs from texts for systems mapping', written by Jordan White and Pete Barbrook-Johnson. See: www.cecan.ac.uk/resources/to...

[image or embed]

— CECAN (@cecan.bsky.social) April 3, 2025 at 2:53 PM
Share This